2013/4/6 Sven Jacobs <[email protected]>: > >> How about TemporaryTable.this.field("ID")? > > > field() returns a Field but a TableField is required. So I'm still stuck :'( > Would be much easier if TableFieldImpl were public ;-)
Yeah. It would be easier for a couple of minutes. Then you'd start hacking around with those internals and everything would explode ;-) I've updated issue #2374 with a new comment. https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2374#issuecomment-16003012 This suggestion might be a solution to your issue where your QualifiedField isn't equal to the required TableField Could you please provide some feedback on that? Cheers Lukas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
