OK. I will add integration tests to ensure that BINARY(16) or similar types work well with jOOQ's mapping them to UUID, in all databases: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2531
Cheers Lukas 2013/6/19 Roger Thomas <[email protected]> > Thanks for the reply, I'm currently planning to go with VARCHAR(36) as I > don't have a space problem and anyway it will be easier to decode/view the > results:) > > If I get some R&D time, I'll try BYTE(16) and let you know. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
