Hi Venkat Your suggestion appears sensible at first, although I'm sure there had been a good reason for the current design - either related to initialisation or (less likely) to naming collisions. I think that the current solution guarantees that tables and fields are initialised before primary keys, which again are initialised before foreign keys.
I don't rule out a better solution, also with respect to metadata initialisation. Cheers, Lukas ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ----- Von: "Venkat Sadasivam" <[email protected]> Gesendet: 16.09.2013 20:00 An: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: Generate code for specific table Hi Lukas: By creating UniqueKey and ForeignKey constants inside the respective table class will solve the issue. Like use did in Tables.java constants can be referred from appropriate table specific classes. Regards, Venkat On Monday, 16 September 2013 13:13:51 UTC-4, Lukas Eder wrote: Hi Venkat, By "update", do you mean putting Keys.java (and other generated files) under version control? I'm not sure if there is a good solution to this problem, short of generating code at build time, avoiding to check it in. >From previous discussion, I suspect that splitting the 800 tables into >different schemas, or creating different users with distinct grants is not an >option? Cheers Lukas 2013/9/16 Venkat Sadasivam <[email protected]> Hi Lukas: Keys.java contains details for all tables, if I want to generate classes only for a few tables then I cannot update Keys.java. Regards, Venkat On Monday, 16 September 2013 11:16:55 UTC-4, Lukas Eder wrote: Hi Venkat, What is the reason why you do not want the Keys.java class generated? The way jOOQ works right now, this class and its contents are required for records to be updatable, as primary key information is stored in there. Regards, Lukas 2013/9/16 Venkat Sadasivam <[email protected]> Hello: In some instance I want to generate java classes for only a few specific tables. In that case Table classes refers global reference class Keys.java which we do not want. If we turn off generate relation then we records are not updateable. Any suggestion to overcome this issue? Thanks, Venkat -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
