Hello,
I know there have been many discussions on this list regarding a possible
better, more decoupled code generation engine in the future but it seems
that the old not-so-good system is still going to be there for some time.
Therefore, I would like to suggest one or two improvements.
First, regarding the XML file you need to specify in the command line, I
think would be nice if you could use java properties to avoid hardcoding
some of the values.
<jdbc>
<driver>${jdbc.driver}</driver>
<url>${jdbc.url}</url> (...)
</jdbc>
this would allow you to specify some of them using -Dargs in the command
line and make your XML file more portable. After all, the XML file is
likely to be included in version control and it should be interesting to
run it from any machine, encapsulating specific disk path and jdbc settings
in an appropriate shell script.
Second, I think it is currently a pain to implement a default generator to
say "I want this java name for this sql field/table/record" and (I mean no
offense, really!) it's not *extremely well documented*, would it be
possible to configure that from xml?
Kind regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
