Hello, I thank you very much for your response with details.
Thank you. On Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC+8, Lukas Eder wrote: > > Hello, > > For jOOQ 3.2, I'm re-enacting integration tests (for DB2 10.5). So far, I > can say that I do not see any relevant regressions. 1-2 of the new features > from 3.1 do not work correctly, yet. In general, you should be safe to use > jOOQ 3.1 with DB2 > > Cheers > Lukas > > > 2013/9/19 Lukas Eder <[email protected] <javascript:>> > >> Hello, >> >> As you've noted yourself, jOOQ 3.0 and 3.1 releases were not integration >> tested with DB2. Recommending to prefer jOOQ 2.6 is just a disclaimer from >> my side. The choice is up to you. >> >> Chances are, that this lack of integration test coverage might have >> introduced 1-2 regressions or incomplete implementations of new 3.x >> functionality. So far, however, I am not aware of such regressions reported >> by users. >> >> Now, by using jOOQ only as a SQL builder, you can of course further >> reduce the chances of running into such problems. >> >> Regards, >> Lukas >> >> >> 2013/9/19 g savan <[email protected] <javascript:>> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Which version of JOOQ is good for DB2 9.7 SQL building . >>> >>> I want to use JOOQ as just SQL Building. >>> >>> Release not of 3.0 says that "Integration testing not done for DB2, >>> prefer to use 2.6" >>> >>> As I just using as SQL Builder, Is it okay to use JOOQ 3.1? >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
