It seems that the field that DSL.fieldByName methods return always reports java.lang.Object for getType (and, um, "other" or some such for getDataType()).
Is this a bug? Or is there some notion I'm missing of where information from the generated code is and isn't used? If it's not, for some reason, reasonable to expect DSL methods to make use of information from that code generation perhaps there should another layer in the class hierarchy for Fields that aren't typed? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
