Hello Lukas,
> It might not make sense to change the generic <P> type of the DAO to be > the interface, as the return type e.g. on fetchOne() > (http://www.jooq.org/javadoc/latest/org/jooq/DAO.html#fetchOne(org.jooq.Field, > > Z)) should remain the POJO itself. > > Why is that? Shouldn't the implementation class be nowhere in the API? But anyway, I'm not sure this could be a big issue for me. I was just curious. Thanks for the help! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
