I think it would be nice if there was an option in the code generator to define the setter/getters as java.util.Date and not java.sql.Date/Timestamp. I know their is a difference in the objects and I would expect that when fetching a record, the implementation of the java.util.Date value would be one of the java.sql.X ones. I think it would just be nice to do setMyField(new Date()).
I started looking at the code generator and seeing if this was an easy change. It works fine for the pojos, but then fails for the DAOs and Records. I found I ran into an issue with the DataType object. So would this even be possible, or would this seem like it would go against the core design/principles of jOOQ? I assume that supporting this in the pojos might be easy, but I was curious if this would be possible with the records too. Darren -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
