Alexy,

I believe we're both running into the same issue from different
angles.  I've created a test class in org.jooq.test.spring in the
jOOQ-codegen-maven-example tree and have been trying to recreate my
problems there.  I reused your suggestion and switched from selectOne
to selecting from the test class T_BOOK, but was unable to recreate
what you were seeing.  I'll try and post a gist later.  Your situation
may be that the using() method you're calling isn't creating a new DSL
context each time, and is therefore running into the known thread
safety issues.

Hope that helps, I'm still plugging away on my end.

Thanks,
Jason




On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:32 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> There is much more simpler example for testng semantic
>
>     @Test(threadPoolSize = 10, invocationCount = 100)
>     public void concurrencyForFinder() {
>         TransactionStatus tx = transactionManager.getTransaction(new
> DefaultTransactionDefinition());
>
>         using(config).select().from(USER_BLOCK).fetchCount();
>
>         transactionManager.commit(tx);
>     }
>
> You could use any table there. And it is with DataSourceTransactionManager
> so no any hibernate code involved. Errors are 100% reproducible.
>
>
>
> On Friday, December 13, 2013 1:22:25 AM UTC+4, Jason H wrote:
>>
>> Alexey,
>>
>> I may be misunderstanding, but I thought:
>> tx = transactionManager.getTransaction(new
>> DefaultTransactionDefinition());
>>
>> instantiated a new transaction on the connection after a commit.
>>
>> Anyhow, I am running into similar issues and modified the test in the
>> example code.  However, the selectOne() does not run into currency
>> issues, due to speed, so I abandoned it for the time being.
>>
>> I've been alternating between modifying the example code and modifying
>> my own code (which is too complex to use as an example) to try and
>> find the issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > This is not related to H2 itself - I have the same behaviour at MySQL
>> > instance. And yes it is Hibernate transaction manager because right now
>> > I'm
>> > migrating the app from Hibernate to jooq and I can't just throw it away.
>> > But
>> > I have the same errors with
>> > org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager so it
>> > is
>> > not directly involved.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure about Jason's comment - he has been tried to commit
>> > transaction
>> > one more time and got an error. So I'm not trying to commit twice the
>> > same
>> > transaction - I just have many threads with many transactions that try
>> > to do
>> > a query. Maybe you store a connection somewhere inside record and then
>> > ten
>> > processing thread complete processing and new cycle have to begin JOOQ
>> > rely
>> > on old config-connection values?
>> >
>> > On Friday, December 13, 2013 12:10:04 AM UTC+4, Lukas Eder wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Alex,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the detailed report. I don't think this is a bug in jOOQ,
>> >> but
>> >> maybe it is a "documentation bug", i.e. a flaw with what is currently
>> >> documented here:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://www.jooq.org/doc/3.2/manual/getting-started/tutorials/jooq-with-spring/#comment-1158280997
>> >>
>> >> Notice also Jason's comments on that manual page.
>> >>
>> >> Other possible issues that I can see:
>> >> - You're using H2's MVCC mode, which is still somewhat experimental, I
>> >> believe.
>> >> - Is your using the Spring HibernateTransactionManager intentional?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Lukas
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/12/12 <[email protected]>
>> >>>
>> >>> Guys,
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm trying to jooq in a project with many concurrent web requests and
>> >>> I
>> >>> found really strange behaviour for simple finder methods. There is my
>> >>> code
>> >>> and test for testng
>> >>>
>> >>>  @Override
>> >>>     public UserBlock findById(int userId, int friendId) {
>> >>>         UserBlockRecord record = using(config).fetchOne(USER_BLOCK,
>> >>> byId(userId, friendId));
>> >>>
>> >>>         return ((record == null) ? null :
>> >>> record.into(UserBlock.class));
>> >>>     }
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>     @Test(threadPoolSize = 10, invocationCount = 100)
>> >>>     public void concurrencyForFinder() {
>> >>>         new TransactionTemplate(transactionManager).execute(new
>> >>> TransactionCallbackWithoutResult() {
>> >>>             @Override
>> >>>             protected void
>> >>> doInTransactionWithoutResult(TransactionStatus
>> >>> status) {
>> >>>                 final Random random = new Random();
>> >>>
>> >>>                 userBlockDao.findById(random.nextInt(100),
>> >>> random.nextInt(100));
>> >>>             }
>> >>>         });
>> >>>     }
>> >>>
>> >>> And here is how it is crashing
>> >>>
>> >>>     org.jooq.exception.DataAccessException: SQL [select
>> >>> `user_block`.`user_id`, `user_block`.`friend_id`,
>> >>> `user_block`.`created_time`, `user_block`.`is_block` from `user_block`
>> >>> where
>> >>> (`user_block`.`user_id` = 87 and `user_block`.`friend_id` = 5)];
>> >>> Connection
>> >>> is broken: "session closed" [90067-173]
>> >>>         at org.jooq.impl.Utils.translate(Utils.java:1158)
>> >>>         at
>> >>>
>> >>> org.jooq.impl.DefaultExecuteContext.sqlException(DefaultExecuteContext.java:495)
>> >>>         at org.jooq.impl.AbstractQuery.execute(AbstractQuery.java:325)
>> >>>         at
>> >>>
>> >>> org.jooq.impl.AbstractResultQuery.fetchLazy(AbstractResultQuery.java:344)
>> >>>         at
>> >>>
>> >>> org.jooq.impl.AbstractResultQuery.fetchLazy(AbstractResultQuery.java:335)
>> >>>         at org.jooq.impl.SelectImpl.fetchLazy(SelectImpl.java:1044)
>> >>>         at
>> >>> org.jooq.impl.DefaultDSLContext.fetchLazy(DefaultDSLContext.java:1778)
>> >>>         at
>> >>> org.jooq.impl.DefaultDSLContext.fetchOne(DefaultDSLContext.java:1758)
>> >>>         at
>> >>> ***********.UserBlockDaoImpl.findById(UserBlockDaoImpl.java:48)
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm using Spring to couple everything together so there is my xml
>> >>>
>> >>>     <bean id="pooledDataSource"
>> >>> class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.SimpleDriverDataSource">
>> >>>         <property name="driverClass" value="org.h2.Driver"/>
>> >>>         <property name="url"
>> >>>
>> >>> value="jdbc:h2:mem:testdb;LOCK_TIMEOUT=30000;MVCC=true;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1;MODE=MySQL;INIT=RUNSCRIPT
>> >>> FROM 'classpath:database/init_schema.sql';"/>
>> >>>     </bean>
>> >>>
>> >>>     <bean id="dataSource"
>> >>>
>> >>> class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.TransactionAwareDataSourceProxy">
>> >>>                         <property name="targetDataSource"
>> >>> ref="pooledDataSource" />
>> >>>     </bean>
>> >>>
>> >>>     <bean id="transactionManager"
>> >>>
>> >>> class="org.springframework.orm.hibernate4.HibernateTransactionManager">
>> >>>         <property name="sessionFactory" ref="sessionFactory" />
>> >>>     </bean>
>> >>>
>> >>>     <bean id="jooqConfig" class="org.jooq.impl.DefaultConfiguration">
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="0">
>> >>>             <bean class="org.jooq.impl.DataSourceConnectionProvider">
>> >>>                 <constructor-arg ref="dataSource" />
>> >>>             </bean>
>> >>>         </constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="1"><null /></constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="2"><null /></constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="3"><null /></constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="4"><null /></constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="5"><value
>> >>> type="org.jooq.SQLDialect">MYSQL</value></constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="6">
>> >>>             <bean class="org.jooq.conf.Settings">
>> >>>                 <property name="renderSchema" value="false" />
>> >>>                 <property name="statementType"
>> >>> value="STATIC_STATEMENT"
>> >>> />
>> >>>             </bean>
>> >>>         </constructor-arg>
>> >>>         <constructor-arg index="7"><null /></constructor-arg>
>> >>>     </bean>
>> >>>
>> >>> Is it somethign wrong with my config or I faced with a bug?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you,
>> >>> Alex.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> Groups
>> >>> "jOOQ User Group" group.
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> >>> an
>> >>> email to [email protected].
>> >>>
>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> >>
>> >>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "jOOQ User Group" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jOOQ User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ 
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to