Group,

I'm still not 100% convinced that #2700 should be implemented as suggested:
https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2700

The suggestion is to check if NOT NULL constraints and DEFAULT values are
available on any given column, and then change the behaviour of a
DAO.insert() method to treat Java nulls as SQL DEFAULTs, instead of SQL
NULLs. While this may seem useful in this particular use-case, it seems to
me that we're about to open yet another pandora's box of unexpected
behaviour.

This is why I postpone this fix. There's a valid workaround in most cases,
and I better get this completely right.

Cheers
Lukas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ 
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to