Hi Garret, 2014-04-28 16:59 GMT+02:00 Garret Wilson <[email protected]>:
> On Monday, April 28, 2014 7:30:23 AM UTC-7, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> ... >> >> Did you encounter this issue with jOOQ 3.3, i.e. with the latest version? >> > > > Ah, you know, what? I indeed encountered that bug with an older version > (which is also why I didn't see that separate name mangling issue at > first). I had already worked around the relative directory issue before > realizing I was using an older version. > > (I'll note that the online example indicates an older version, which was > why I wound up with the wrong version in the first place. I realize that > it's hard to keep all the documentation up-to-date. I assume that the > various Maven plugins documentations use some sort of expression evaluation > to keep version numbers up-to-date.) > Hmm, the versions should all match. Where did you find the wrong version? Note that you linked to a manual from version 3.1: http://www.jooq.org/doc/3.1/manual/code-generation/codegen-configuration/ In that manual, obviously, all jOOQ artefacts are also from version 3.1.x. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
