The reason why I asked is because Eclipse and javac often differ in terms of how they interpret the JLS's generics specification. An example (still unresolved, I believe): http://stackoverflow.com/q/5361513/521799
In this case, it's really a bug (or rather API flaw) in jOOQ, though. Cheers, Lukas 2014-06-24 17:40 GMT+02:00 Eric Wadsworth <[email protected]>: > I'm using IntelliJ IDEA, so the test was run with that compiler. (I didn't > try it with plain javac, but I would be surprised if that succeeded when > the IntelliJ run of it failed.) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
