Yes it is me. I posted on both boards to get at least one answer. TY! I posted on the DW board, here is a copy:
1:51 PM (less than a minute ago) Thanks Lukas! I am not sure I am breaking any grounds, I am rather just curious as to why there haven't been any either community or vendor supported DW bundle for jooq. A bundle would make the adoption more natural, than fighting at integrating another library... >From the look of jooq, it seems very very appealing on a few dimensions compared to JDBI (still not sure how one would implement transactions -intrinsic to jooq or outside?...-). I can see how it can speed up dev workflow though. I wish I had time to dive in the jooq world and implement some type of DW integration.I think somebody more fluent than me in framework dev (DW & JOOQ) should do it. For now, JDBI is working for us, however I am thinking a well documented framework like jooq -especially with a commercial company behind it- would benefit from developing more natural setups in more frameworks. For example, majority of DW adopters are either going to lean toward JDBI or Hibernate just because how natural either libraries are setup in the framework (similar in SpringMVC: JPA or SpringJDBC ?). If there were native integrations with JOOQ, there would certainly be more adopters. I will definitely keep an eye on JOOQ! As as architect, I definitely would benefit from using it on next projects. I selfishly -lazily- will wait till I see more adopters/integrations :) Cheers! -S On Friday, September 19, 2014 4:49:58 AM UTC-5, Lukas Eder wrote: > > Hello, > > I suspect that this message here is also from you? > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/dropwizard-user/QYA9tiK8e_A > > As I mentioned on the dropwizard user group: > > You might be breaking new grounds, at least from a public documentation > perspective! > > While jOOQ is steadily growing in popularity (e.g. on the RebelLabs radar, > quickly catching up with MyBatis: > http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/java-tools-and-technologies-landscape-for-2014/10/), > > not all combinations of jOOQ + UI frameworks have been documented yet - if > dropwizard can even be considered a UI framework. > > If there's anything we can help you with making a jOOQ+Dropwizard > integration more easy, we'll be more than happy to do so. > > > Cheers, > Lukas > > 2014-09-17 21:52 GMT+02:00 Sbham <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > >> Hey there >> >> I am just getting to discover JOOQ. Most of our API dev is done using >> Dropwizard and for DB work we use JDBI. I am very intrigued with Jooq and >> would like to start a small spike with DW+JOOQ. >> But before that, I was wondering if anybody is currently using jooq with >> Dropwizard and if they have any pointers or even starter projects. >> >> Cheers! >> -S >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jOOQ User Group" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
