2014-09-25 15:45 GMT+02:00 Ben Hood <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Lukas Eder <[email protected]> wrote: > > I know. Well, the query languages essentially work the same way. I just > > guess that SQL is a lot more work than CQL, though. > > Very true - CQL has about 3% of the functionality that SQL has. > > > I think when you go for Go (pun intended), then you're bound to re-invent > > wheels given the lack of adoption of Go so far... > > And indeed I have - I've just started to spike out a solution to see > if it can hold water: https://github.com/relops/sqlc > > But I haven't bashed into a shape where I think it's useable for real > world stuff just yet. > > You can see where it draws it's inspiration from :-) >
Yep :-) Well, I'll certainly be looking out for future developments! > > Is there any Java interoperability capability in Go? > > It has been done, but I don't think it's hip enough to go mainstream > just yet: https://github.com/abneptis/GoJVM what?? ====== ... ('extreme XML' comes to mind). ... why-in-gods-name ================ ... I don't exactly envy you Go guys. I guess for now, I'll be sticking with Java ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
