On a more serious note (sorry, couldn't resist 5 minutes ago) I'm sorry to see you go because of this. I do believe that you will find the missing features limiting after a while, but I certainly understand that moving a project forward can be essential. I'm curious about the "bit slower" part. How does this manifest?
2014-11-27 13:25 GMT+01:00 Lukas Eder <[email protected]>: > > > 2014-11-27 12:42 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: > >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> Hah! Yes I had assumed from the example that it was generic jdbc >> positioning based binding. Tried every relevant method on the classes >> involved. Can't say I have any recollection of seeing getParent(). >> >> I plan on giving Jooq another try, but refactored to something called >> QueryDSL to move this project forward. It appears to be a lot like Jooq, >> only a bit slower with less features. >> > > See you back here, soon, then :-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
