2015-02-03 16:48 GMT+01:00 Josh Padnick <[email protected]>: > Hello there. I'm chiming in on this thread 10 months later. > > I'm about to begin a new project with Play Framework and Scala and would > like to use jOOQ over Slick if I can. Have there been any significant > updates in either documentation or Scala integration that Scala users might > find helpful since this was originally posted in March 20, 2014? >
No, it hasn't been a priority in 2014 > Any success stories of Scala users going to production with jOOQ? > We have a couple of paying customers who have gone live with jOOQ and we haven't heard from them apart from subscription renewal, so I take that as a good sign. > I prefer the jOOQ paradigm but am nervous about edge cases I may run into > down the line. > The only edge cases that I'm aware of are lack of support for scala.Option and a lack of support for scala.Int et al., although one of the more interesting driving forces behind jOOQ 3.5's org.jooq.Binding API is to enable support for these user types. *Hopefully, other users might see this discussion and chime in, too* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
