Yes, it is Oracle.
By the way, is there a way to override JOOQ behavior for such situations in
the future?
I expected that DSL.inline() will help and output as is, but Jooq tries to
wrap it with "" anyway - it would be great if I could fix it until bug or
problem is fixed.
воскресенье, 22 марта 2015 г., 19:24:04 UTC+3 пользователь Oleg написал:
>
> Hi
>
> I have select like this in Jooq 3.5.0:
>
> ...
>
> .forUpdate()
> .of(Tables.CLIENT.as("clients").NUM., Tables.ACCOUNT.as("accounts").ID)
> .skipLocked()
> .fetch();
>
>
> The generated SQL will end with
>
>
> FOR UPDATE OF "NUM", "ID" SKIP LOCKED
>
>
> instead of
>
>
> FOR UPDATE OF "clients"."NUM", "accounts"."ID" SKIP LOCKED
>
>
>
> Is it possible to make JOOQ use table alias in the for update statement?
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
