2015-05-19 18:11 GMT+02:00 Tariq Bugrara <[email protected]>: > Unfortunately there are date ranges with the same start date and > unfortunately we can't move to Java 8 because we're still using db4o :( but > we're moving to MySQL and jOOQ's been great so far. >
Interesting, how does db4o prevent using Java 8? Or is this related to your moving to MySQL from another database? Thanks for the clarification though! Do you think moving towards using a > record instead of a list is something worth being contributed? > The relevant issue is this one here: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/2601 Thank you very much for your offer. Right now, I don't think we should break compatibility with this change. In fact, let's wait and see if the change is necessary at all. Right now, we're evaluating whether the jOOQ 3.7 should support Java 8 (supporting Java 6 from the commercial jOOQ editions). A lot of great features can be derived if jOOQ Cursors can be turned into Streams directly. Once we support Java 8, we'll also move a bit of jOOλ (https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOL) functionality into jOOQ. In that case, grouping Results will be much easier with jOOQ... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
