Glad it works! :)

2015-12-01 22:07 GMT+01:00 Mark Derricutt <[email protected]>:

> On 1 Dec 2015, at 22:22, Lukas Eder wrote:
>
> >  public Optional<Foo> findFoos() {
> >    return findBaseFoo(() -> Foo.FIELD1.eq(.....));
> >
> > Alternatively, instead of a Supplier<Condition>, you could just simply
> pass the Condition itself, defaulting to DSL.trueCondition() if no
> Condition is supplied.
>
> Sometimes the simple option is well.... just the simple option - I think
> that works perfectly well.
>
> Cheers
> Mark
>
>
> --
> Mark Derricutt
> http://www.theoryinpractice.net
> http://www.chaliceofblood.net
> http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt
> http://twitter.com/talios
> http://facebook.com/mderricutt
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jOOQ User Group" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ 
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to