Same problem here. Any solution? On Friday, August 23, 2013 at 1:36:21 AM UTC+8, Christian Hammers wrote: > > Hello > > My tables are usually called with plural names like "customers" as they > contain > many rows. The generated ActiveRecord and POJO classes do thus also have > this > name which looks ridiculous especially if I have lists of them: > > Customers c = new Customers(); // a single one > List<Customers> customerss; // multiple > > Is there any chance that JOOQ could be a little bit more clever about > this? > > The Propel ORM for example does a really good job using: > propel.builder.pluralizer.class = builder.util.StandardEnglishPluralizer > See http://propelorm.org/documentation/whats-new.html#better-pluralizer > > Best Regards > > -christian- >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
