Hi Denis, 2016-06-15 13:47 GMT+01:00 Denis Miorandi <[email protected]>:
> Hi Lukas, > when you say @Transactional is not supported you mean > @Transactional attributes not supported I suppose. > What I really meant is that the two approaches (Spring / AOP / declarative vs. jOOQ / programmatic) are not really a good match. They shouldn't be mixed, in my opinion. This is independent of jOOQ. You probably wouldn't mix Spring's annotations with Spring's programmatic APIs either. But perhaps you've found a use-case where mixing is reasonable? > Actually my SpringTransactionProvider allow use of @Transactional > annotations > ( creating a jooq Transaction in a transparent way) the only missing > things are @Transactional parameters. > Oh, interesting! Would you be interested in sharing this code? Would be very useful to look into how you did this. > I suspect actually due SpringTransactionProvider is created at spring > boot time it can't intercept specific instance call parameters. > Anyway I'm looking forward to #4836. > I've added some comments here. > Hmm, not sure. It's a "provider". You can implement it in any way you want. It doesn't have to initialise everything when it is initialised itself... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
