Thank you very much for reporting Kai, and Rick. I have created an issue: https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/5408
The regression was created because of overlooked switch fall through paths for PostgreSQL, Firebird, and Oracle. I'll check up to see why the integration tests didn't fail for this release. This kind of regression should not happen. I'll release 3.8.4 with a patch this week. Thanks again for reporting! Lukas 2016-07-12 12:21 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > I encounter the same issue in Version 3.8.3 with Oracle 12C using > record.update(). > > The query exposes SQL statement which starts with "begin update ... > returning "MY_SCHEMA"."MY_TABLE"."MY_KEY" into ?; end;" > If I prevent using > org.jooq.impl.TableRecordImpl#setReturningIfNeeded > in class > org.jooq.impl.UpdatableRecordImpl#storeUpdate0 > then the execute statement returns 0 on concurrent modification. > > For me this issue renders using record.update() useless. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jOOQ User Group" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
