Hello Lukas,
First, thank you for creating jOOQ ( and giving a serious alternative to
JPA / Hibernate). We use jOOQ heavily in our projects.
For primary and foreign keys, we have a custom UUID class with generics
like MyUuid<T> and added a Converter from java.util.UUID to our MyUuid.
With the generic-MyUuid, you get an additional type safety. Now the problem
is, that the converter does not respect the generic type and generates
Methods like:
public class MyTableRecord ... {
// ...
public void setId(MyUuid value) { // better: setId(MyUuid<MyTableRecord>
value)
setValue(0, value);
}
public void setOtherFk(MyUuid value) { // better:
setOtherFk(MyUuid<OtherRecord>
value)
setValue(6, value);
}
// ...
}
Is there a way to hook into the code-generation process to set the generic
types-correctly.
( Tested with jOOQ 3.9.1 and PG 9.1)
Thank you,
Kiru
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
