2017-05-08 21:02 GMT+02:00 Adam Gent <[email protected]>: > > > On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 4:41:04 AM UTC-4, Lukas Eder wrote: >> >> Thanks for sharing, Adam. That's a very interesting approach, so the >> generation is always "all or nothing" and it won't allow for incremental >> builds, right? >> >> > Yes that is mostly correct. We don't import the jooq code generation > modules (ie the maven modules that run the generator). > Instead developers run `mvn install` for the jooq module and let > Eclipse/IntelliJ just delegate to their respective maven plugins for the > rest of the imported modules. > IIRC both IDEs are smart enough to pick up the SNAPSHOT locally installed > jar. > > To enable looking at the code we also attach sources. Both IntelliJ and > Eclipse are pretty smart about finding the source as well with their maven > plugins. > People crap on Maven but the IDE integration is incredibly good for all > three major IDEs. > > If you are running the generator and attaching sources (ie generating a > source jar) you will want to do: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4253700/maven-phase-executing-twice > > Otherwise the generator will run twice. > > >> If incremental builds are desired (e.g. a database change involves only >> 1-2 columns that need regeneration), then, perhaps the catalog / schema >> version provider SPI could be useful, instead: >> https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest/manual/code-generation/codeg >> en-advanced/codegen-config-version-providers >> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jooq.org%2Fdoc%2Flatest%2Fmanual%2Fcode-generation%2Fcodegen-advanced%2Fcodegen-config-version-providers&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGoOZbDrdX1rDPrSpf1PSEwnpv5_g> >> >> This works very well with Flyway, where the schema version provider can >> look up the schema version in the Flyway migration table and prevent a >> re-generation if the version hasn't changed. >> >> > That is a very interesting SPI. I'll have to take a look at that but > currently many of our projects are stuck on JDK 7 (thus we are on 3.6 ... > I'm embarrassed to go into the detail of why that is). >
If only there were a Java 6/7 distribution available ;) https://www.jooq.org/download/versions > > I presume Axel knows about this SPI? > I'm sure he does, we talked about these things around beers at some point :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
