It gets generated when I leave out
databaseConfig.setIncludes("example");
With the configuration above it does not.
Am Freitag, 16. Juni 2017 10:31:31 UTC+2 schrieb Lukas Eder:
>
> Thank you very much for your report.
>
> This looks like a bug. I've registered an issue for this:
> https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/issues/6349
>
> A similar issue has been reported on Stack Overflow as well:
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/44410402/521799
>
> Can you confirm the enum type is generated, but it isn't linked to the
> generated tables?
>
> Best Regards,
> Lukas
>
> 2017-06-16 10:12 GMT+02:00 jklingsporn <[email protected] <javascript:>
> >:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've figured out that when generating code using the programmatic
>> configuration enums are not properly generated/mapped. Since I'm not sure
>> if I'm doing it wrong, I post in this group rather than creating a github
>> issue ^^
>> This is the code-generator:
>>
>> public class Main {
>>
>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>> Configuration configuration = createGeneratorConfig();
>> try {
>> GenerationTool.generate(configuration);
>> } catch (Exception e) {
>> e.printStackTrace();
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> private static Configuration createGeneratorConfig(){
>> Jdbc jdbcConfig = new Jdbc();
>> jdbcConfig.setDriver("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver");
>> jdbcConfig.setUrl("jdbc:mysql://127.0.0.1:3306/");
>> jdbcConfig.setUser("user");
>> jdbcConfig.setPassword("password");
>>
>> Configuration configuration = new Configuration();
>> Database databaseConfig = new Database();
>> databaseConfig.setName(MySQLDatabase.class.getName());
>> databaseConfig.setInputSchema("test");
>> databaseConfig.setOutputSchemaToDefault(true);
>> databaseConfig.setIncludes("example");
>>
>> Target targetConfig = new Target();
>> targetConfig.setPackageName("generated");
>> targetConfig.setDirectory("src/main/java");
>>
>> Generate generateConfig = new Generate();
>> generateConfig.withInterfaces(true);
>>
>> Strategy strategy = new Strategy();
>> strategy.setName(DefaultGeneratorStrategy.class.getName());
>>
>> Generator generatorConfig = new Generator();
>> generatorConfig.setName(JavaGenerator.class.getName());
>> generatorConfig.setDatabase(databaseConfig);
>> generatorConfig.setTarget(targetConfig);
>> generatorConfig.setGenerate(generateConfig);
>> generatorConfig.setStrategy(strategy);
>> configuration.setGenerator(generatorConfig);
>>
>> configuration.setJdbc(jdbcConfig);
>>
>> return configuration;
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> This is how the table looks like:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE `example` (
>> `someId` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
>> `someEnum` enum('FOO','BAR','BAZ') DEFAULT NULL,
>> PRIMARY KEY (`someId`)
>> ) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=1 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_bin;
>>
>>
>> And finally this is the generated interface:
>>
>> @Generated(
>> value = {
>> "http://www.jooq.org";,
>> "jOOQ version:3.9.2"
>> },
>> comments = "This class is generated by jOOQ"
>> )
>> @SuppressWarnings({ "all", "unchecked", "rawtypes" })
>> public interface IExample extends Serializable {
>>
>> /**
>> * Setter for <code>example.someId</code>.
>> */
>> public void setSomeid(Integer value);
>>
>> /**
>> * Getter for <code>example.someId</code>.
>> */
>> public Integer getSomeid();
>>
>> /**
>> * Setter for <code>example.someEnum</code>.
>> */
>> public void setSomeenum(String value);
>>
>> /**
>> * Getter for <code>example.someEnum</code>.
>> */
>> public String getSomeenum();
>>
>> //
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> // FROM and INTO
>> //
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> /**
>> * Load data from another generated Record/POJO implementing the common
>> interface IExample
>> */
>> public void from(generated.tables.interfaces.IExample from);
>>
>> /**
>> * Copy data into another generated Record/POJO implementing the common
>> interface IExample
>> */
>> public <E extends generated.tables.interfaces.IExample> E into(E into);
>> }
>>
>>
>> Obviously I've expected field someEnum to be an generated EnumType and
>> not String. What am I doing wrong?
>> PS: generating code using the maven-generator works and I'm using jooq
>> 3.9.2.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "jOOQ User Group" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ
User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
