Guten Tag Lukas Eder, am Freitag, 7. Februar 2020 um 15:37 schrieben Sie: > Does this make sense?
Absolutely, thanks! :-) You only have my old code, already changed it to what you suggested right now. BUT: Not with using a custom table, but my former approach with individual, unrelated fields only. Would be great if you could have an additional look and tell me if my current approach should work or doesn't make any sense. Didn't execute anything currently. I had the feeling that my current implementation should work as well, because jOOQ simply renders given field names and as long those are available by some CTE, things will simply work. Or do I really NEED custom tables like in your former suggestion? Because what I have now is what I want, especially after reading your suggestion, and if I need custom tables to get that, I will change my definitions to custom tables. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Thorsten Schöning -- Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/ Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55 Fax...............05151- 9468- 88 Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04 AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jooq-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jooq-user/19810355178.20200207165017%40am-soft.de.
MclmSchema.java
Description: Binary data
MclmSummary.java
Description: Binary data
