-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/13/12 11:33 AM, Matt Miller wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2012, at 14:31, Mike Jones wrote: > >> * Should StringOrURI use IRIs rather than RFC 3986 URIs? >> Opinions? Is this a standing IETF requirement now, or is this >> being handled on case-by-case basis as makes sense in context? >> > > If humans are involved, then i18n is a concern. I suspect, at the > least, "jku" and "x5u" will require support for internationalized > values. UTF-8-encoded Unicode codepoints can be represented in URIs using pct-encoding, so I don't necessarily see a need to directly support IRIs. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8501wACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzkLACfUem3ihTSHBkReWD1kWVzTdya tBwAoI05q1MD7bMtzOK7sVcP+X2RY1q5 =fXWp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ jose mailing list jose@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
