Here's some comments (again I'll try not to duplicate Jim's):
1) s2 & Requirements Language: The RFC editor is going to move the
Requirements Language section later on so you might as well save them
the trouble and just make it part of s2.
2) s3: This is probably a style thing, but I think it's probably better
to talk about the structure first and then provide an example. It's
just going to make everybody ask you to define/explain x in that section.
3) s4: Totally agree with Jim's comment #4 on this section. Applies to
s5 as well.
4) s4: Same concerns as for algorithms about the collision resistant
namespace and how the registry is set up.
5) s4.2: Assume "both" should be defined here.
6) s7: If the kid is not supposed to be generated in a way to make it
unique it's worth pointing this out in s7.
spt
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
