DISCUSS On Aug 17, 2012, at 12:07 AM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> <CHAIR> > > If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to > provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS. > > Do we need to require the ability for doing a key agree followed by a key > wrap to get the CMK? > > Current process uses the output of the key agree as the CMK, saying yes > would allow for both methods to operate. > > Room vote: 12 yes, 1 no, 1 discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
