I voted "NO" on this in the room, because I don't understand it. Could one of you "YES" voters explain it?
What does "kid" mean in the context of a public-key wrapped key? Is it a public key? If so, in what format? How about in the context of key agreement? Thanks, --Richard -- Richard Barnes Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 at 1:55 PM, HAYASHI, Tatsuya wrote: > YES > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 5:15 PM, <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > YES > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim > > Schaad > > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:05 AM > > To: [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > Subject: [jose] POLL: Is KID sufficently defined > > > > <CHAIR> > > > > If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to > > provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS. > > > > Is the current text for KID sufficiently defined and understood? > > > > > > Room vote: 2 yes, 0 no, 1 discuss > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jose mailing list > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > _______________________________________________ > > jose mailing list > > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > > > > > > > -- > HAYASHI, Tatsuya > Lepidum Co. Ltd. > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
