-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We don't actually vote at the IETF. :-)
But it seems that "the sense of the group" is pretty clear on this one... /psa On 8/28/12 12:43 PM, Edmund Jay wrote: > Sorry, I made a mistake. I would like to change my vote to YES. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Edmund Jay <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] *Sent:* Tue, August 28, 2012 10:52:53 AM > *Subject:* Re: [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single name > > NO > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Jim Schaad <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] *Sent:* Fri, August 17, 2012 12:09:15 AM > *Subject:* [jose] POLL: Non AEAD algorithms as a single name > > <CHAIR> > > If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you > want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to > DISCUSS. > > Should we change the current treatment of AES-CBC + HMAC to use a > single content encryption name. > > Old: {"enc":"A128CBC", "int":HS256", "kdf":"CS256"} New: > {"enc":"AES128CBC+HS256+CS256"} > > Exact name is still to be determined > > Room vote: 12 yes, 2 no, 0 discuss > > > _______________________________________________ jose mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > > _______________________________________________ jose mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlA9EacACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxPMwCgzZgeu/GNlLmu0a09v4e/3eVe 4wcAn1kxJPQS/XE4ey28F4oas694P2i/ =UQK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
