yes (I can't honestly remember if I voted in Vancouver but I'm pretty sure I abstained on this one at that time)
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > Given the confusion around the original version of this poll, I'd like to > try again. > > The basic question is unchanged, the room count from Vancouver has been > corrected, and a clarification regarding the status of SHA1 in the OAEP > specification has been added. For those of you who voted and feel you may > have misunderstood the question or voted incorrectly, please feel free to > update your answer. > > Question: > Should SHA1 (and mgf1SHA1) be the default parameters for these algorithms? > Note: These are the default parameters specified in RFC 3447, Section > A.2.1, and are widely deployed. > > Room vote: 5 yes, 0 no, 3 discuss > > Thanks, > Karen > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
