Folks, The results of this poll were: 7 YES - We need to define a nonce/timestamp parameter in the base specification 1 NO - We do not need to define a nonce/timestamp parameter in the base specification 14 DISCUSS - More discussion is needed
Many people discussing this issue commented that the question was underspecified. Based upon these results, I do not believe that a reasonable consensus call is possible on the question as stated. This issue remains open. Please comment on the mailing list and be prepared to resolve in Atlanta. Thanks to all who participated in this poll. Karen O'Donoghue (writing as working group co-chair) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Schaad Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 12:05 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [jose] POLL: Nonce/Timestamp parameter <CHAIR> If you voted at the face-2-face please do not vote again. If you want to provide comments please change the title from POLL to DISCUSS. Do we need to define a nonce/timestamp parameter in the base specification? Room vote: 6 yes, 0 no, 1 discuss _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
