An answer not related to the size issue which might be relevant regardless: http://world.std.com/~dtd/sign_encrypt/sign_encrypt7.html
--Axel 2012/10/29 Dick Hardt <[email protected]> > > Let's say we have created a JWE as such: > > > headerOne.encryptedKeyOne.initializationVectorOne.ciphertextOne.integritityVectorOne > > This is now the payload to a JWS. Rather than increasing the token size by > 4/3 by URL safe base 64 encoding the payload (since it is already URL > safe), it would be useful to have a JWS header parameter that indicates the > payload was not re-encoded and does not need to be URL safe base 64 decoded. > > As there are more periods than expected in a JWS, decoding would ignore > all periods except the first and last one for separating out the header, > payload and signature. > > The indicating parameter would seem to be either "tip" or "cty". I'm still > confused about the difference between the two parameters, so not sure which > one is appropriate. > > -- Dick > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
