Hannes,
I share your concern. If JOSE is to be used more widely than in the
OpenID context, then it
probably is not a good idea to rely on constructs/conventions from that
context re extensions.
Steve
On 2/7/13 3:50 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Hi Mike,
whatever story the group comes up with I believe it would be important to
describe this in the document since other specifications have followed a
different approach.
Knowing you guys I had already expected that you try to solve this
extensibility issue using additional OpenID Connect specifications.
I am wondering what approach other specifications have used in the past. My
understanding is that XML, CMS, and PSKC follow a model where the mandatory to
implement functionality is defined in the specification and additional
specifications indicate what additional extensions have to be used. Is my
understanding correct?
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
