I also think that this would be very cumbersome to support and needs much more thought
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 6:43 AM To: Richard Barnes Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [jose] SPI proposal Admittedly I'm not really up on this spi issue or the motivation behind it but a couple questions came to mind when I saw this. How does the receiver protect against unbounded growth of the cache? And index collision? And for distributed environments, it seems supporting this could be very cumbersome. On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: To move us toward closing Issue #9 [9], here is some proposed text for an SPI [1] field. To recall, SPI stands for "security parameters index", borrowing a term from IPsec. The idea is that in cases where the same crypto parameters are being used repeatedly, this would save the parties from having to re-send the same parameters. The below text is designed for the JWE spec, but could be adapted for JWS (just keep header, ignore part about key/iv). Similar text is probably needed for the encryption/decryption/signing/verification sections. Feedback welcome, --Richard -----BEGIN----- Section 4.1.X. "spi" Header Parameter The "spi" (Security Parameters Index) header parameter contains an opaque byte string that labels a set of security parameters. This index is designed to enable the use of smaller headers in cases where entities will be re-using the same security parameters for several messages. Entities supporting the use of the "spi" parameter MUST maintain a table of cached security parameters. When an entity receives an object whose header contains both "spi" and "alg" values, then it MUST cache the following values from the JWE, indexed by the "spi" value: -- Contents of the JWE header -- Encrypted Key -- Initialization Vector If an object containing an "spi" parameter but no "alg" parameter, then it MUST NOT contain an Encrypted Key or Initialization Vector. That is, it will have the form "header.ciphertext.integrity_value". When a recipient receives such an object, it uses the "spi" value to retrieve cached header, key, and initialization vector and reconstructs a full JWE. This full JWE can then be further processed according to the normal JWE processing rules. If the recipient has no cached parameters for the "spi" value, the process MUST fail. -----END----- [9] http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/9 _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
