ditto. 2013/2/11 Edmund Jay <[email protected]>
> +1 for new I-D. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Brian Campbell <[email protected]> > *To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Fri, February 8, 2013 3:01:51 PM > *Subject:* [jose] Proposal about the SPI proposal > > Maybe this was apparent from my comments/questions on the SPI proposal > over the last couple days[1] but I have concerns that run the gamut from > operational complexity and fragility to security problems. I believe > strongly that, without considerably more analysis and specification detail, > the current SPI work is much too risky to consider go in the current base > JOSE WG drafts. > > As an alternative I'd like to request/propose that the SPI stuff be > submitted as new I-D to help facilitate that additional discussion and > analysis that I think it needs. > > Thanks, > Brian > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/jose/current/msg01500.html > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Chairman, OpenID Foundation http://nat.sakimura.org/ @_nat_en
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
