On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:17 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2) <[email protected]> wrote:
> In thinking about the JWK parameter registry, I have a couple of
> questions/concerns.
>
> 1) Should JWK parameter names be absolutely unique, or are they potentially
> tied to a specific JWK type? In looking at the specs to date, I think
> there's only one case where a parameter name is re-used ("d" for both private
> RSA and ECC keys); currently syntactically and semantically identical, but
> I'm not sure that's adequate.
>
> 2) Should JWK parameters be marked as private (confidential, secret,
> privileged, etc etc)? The current documentation set loosely defines this
> only because they are current split between multiple documents. However, I
> wonder if there is value in being much more explicit about it, including in a
> parameter's registration.
>
>
And, yes, I do (now) remember there was a general call for merging JPSK into
JWA (-:
- m&m
Matt Miller < [email protected] >
Cisco Systems, Inc.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
