I have heard nothing to date, but I get Barry's point we need to reach
out and ask. As, I told him though we're going to reach out but we're
not going to wait indefinitely for a reply.
spt
On 4/8/13 7:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 4/5/13 6:29 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
2. (hard one) Barry's been told by some App folks who are working
on new JSON-based protocols that they don't see the applicability
of JOSE to their work.
Have we heard *why*? Do they not need or want signing and encryption?
Do they think there are technical problems with the solutions being
proposed in the JOSE WG? Do they have aesthetic objections? It would
help to know more about the concerns being expressed (and why they are
not being expressed in the JOSE WG but instead in private to an area
directory).
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=NNLU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
