Knowing that we need to publish an agenda for the interim meeting soon, I
thought I'd propose a starting point to kick off the agenda discussions. My
goal is to have us make the most progress possible towards resolving open
issues.
-- Mike
MONDAY, APRIL 29
===============
9:00-9:30: Note Well, Introductions, Logistics, Goals, Day 1 Agenda Overview -
Jim Schaad and Karen O'Donoghue
9:30-9:50: Overview of Recent changes to JWS, JWE, JWK, and JWA documents -
Mike Jones
The goal of this brief session is for attendees to understand
the changes made and issues addressed by those changes
9:50-10:05: Break
10:05-12:00: Existing Open Issues Session 1
The goal of this session, and the other open issues sessions,
is, for each issue to:
- Identify possible resolutions
- Determine support in the room for each of the
resolutions
- Determine what specific question(s) to ask the
working group on the list
- Propose closure of the issue with a specific
resolution if consensus is apparent
(with actual closure happening after
confirming the consensus on the mailing list)
- Issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with
WebCrypto
- Issue #11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE
Integrity Value field?
- Issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?
- Issue #15: Should at least one key indicator be mandatory?
12:00-12:45: Lunch
12:45-2:45: Existing Open Issues Session 2
- Presentation by Richard Barnes on
draft-barnes-jose-key-wrapping (assuming he's willing!)
- Review by Matt Miller of draft-miller-jose-jwe-protected-jwk
(assuming he's willing!)
- Issue #13: Enable AEAD key wrapping
- Issue #14: Support longer wrapped keys than OAEP allows
2:45-3:05: Break
3:05-5:00: Existing Open Issues Session 3
- Issue #4: Remove wrapped keys from integrity check (allow
separation of keys from data)
- Issue #9: Should we add a "spi" header field?
- Issue #16: URI identifying a specific key in a JWK set
- Issue #17: Add 'aud' and 'iss' to 4.1 Reserved Header
Parameter Names
- Issue #18: Address MAC key lifetime concerns
- Issue #8: Direct mode for key agreement needs security
analysis
TUESDAY, APRIL 30
==============
9:00-9:20: Note Well, Day 2 Agenda Overview - Jim Schaad and Karen O'Donoghue
9:20-10:20: W3C WebCrypto Coordination
Discuss touch points between WebCrypto and JOSE and determine
feedback to give WebCrypto
10:20-10:35: Break
10:35-11:15: Use Cases
Discuss issues with the Use Cases specification and possible
changes needed
11:15-12:00: Next Steps Session 1 - Status of Key Wrapping Drafts
Determine next steps for issues covered in
draft-barnes-jose-key-wrapping and draft-miller-jose-jwe-protected-jwk
In particular, should either become WG drafts?
12:00-12:45: Lunch
12:45-1:45: Next Steps Session 2 - Discuss actions needed to bring JWS, JWE,
JWK, and JWA to Working Group Last Call
The goal of this session is to determine specific steps needed
to achieve WGLC and assign owners and timelines
1:45-2:45: Next Steps Session 3 - Polls and Consensus Calls
Determine specific wording for polls and consensus calls needed
to gather input on remaining open issues
2:45-3:00: Break
3:00-3:20: Next Steps Session 4 - Next Meetings and Phone Calls
Decide when our next meetings will be and at what times to
schedule recurring WG phone calls
3:20-4:00: Summarize of Next Steps
Review next steps, owners, and timelines for those steps to occur
4:00-5:00: Other Topics
This time is reserved to consider other issues or topics that
may arise
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
