On May 23, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Matt Miller (mamille2) > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On May 22, 2013, at 9:16 PM, "Manger, James H" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Do we need a media type for a single JWK? I though URIs in JOSE were >> always expected to result in a set of keys (there might only be 1 key in a >> set, of course). >>> >>> I would prefer one media type: applications/keys+json >>> >> >> Having a media type for a single key would help with wrapped keys: >> >> { >> "alg":"PBES2-A256KW+HS256", >> "enc":"A256-GCM", >> "cty":"application/jwk+json" >> } >> >> ... >> > > This is exactly what I was going to say. > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-barnes-jose-key-wrapping-01#section-2> >
Or, you know, < http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miller-jose-jwe-protected-jwk.html > (-: - m&m Matt Miller < [email protected] > Cisco Systems, Inc.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
