Agreed. It is not a time to do new things. We should just try to go through all the open issues and try to close them.
Nat On Jul 15, 2013, at 18:11, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: I don’t plan to do any presentations. I think we should prioritize issue resolution during our time so as to get to working group last call on JWS, JWE, JWK, and JWA. I believe that John’s presentation would be useful in that regard. I hope that we defer any presentations proposing new features until we’ve completed issue resolution – granting time to them on an as-available basis. -- Mike *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *John Bradley *Sent:* Monday, July 15, 2013 5:55 PM *To:* Jim Schaad *Cc:* [email protected] *Subject:* Re: [jose] IETF 87 Meeting Agenda I can do a presentation like the one from IETF 86 reviewing open issues and proposed resolutions to get us to last call. I can do all or a subset of the specs as people prefer. John B. On 2013-07-10, at 4:31 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: <chair> Please send the chairs if you are planning to do, want to do a presentation at the Berlin meeting. Please include the name of the presenter, what documents (if any) are to be addressed and an estimated presentation time. Please focus on issues in presentations and not historical data. Jim _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
