#69: Section 3.1 - "kty" (Key Type) Parameter
A. Para #1 - Remove reference on the registry that is not where the
registry is.
B. Para #1 - s/use of this member is REQUIRED./The 'kty' member MUST be
present in a JWK./
This is a more affirmative statement of what needs to be done by the
user and makes it easier to write the test cases at a later point.
C. Para #2 - Potentially remove the 'where is the initial registry'
comment
D. Para #3 - Clarification is needed on what the additional members used
with "kty" values are.
E. Need to discuss that some kty values will require or recommend that
specific members be present in the JWK. Also need to discuss how an
implementation is supposed to know this (i.e. is it part of the registry
entry?).
--
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
[email protected] | [email protected]
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: json-web- | Version:
key | Keywords:
Severity: - |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <https://grenache.tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/trac/ticket/69>
jose <http://tools.ietf.org/jose/>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
