I'm with Jim and Karen on this one.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Karen O'Donoghue <[email protected]>wrote:

>  True, but, is there any harm in making the term clearer as well? I don't
> see one...
>
> Karen
>
>
> On 12/13/13 11:53 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
>  The meaning of “Prohibited” is already clear.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-18#section-7.1.1says:
>
>       Any identifiers registered for non-authenticated encryption
> algorithms
>
>       or other algorithms that are otherwise unsuitable for direct use
>
>       as JWS or JWE algorithms must be registered as "Prohibited".
>
>
>
> I don’t think a change is needed.
>
>
>
>                                                             -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* jose [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Mark Watson
> *Sent:* Friday, December 13, 2013 5:43 PM
> *To:* Jim Schaad
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [jose] Issue #187 - Allow registration of non-JWE/JWS
> algorithms for JWK
>
>
>
> Yes, I think it would be clearer to change or quality the term. "JWK only"
> or "Key Transport Only" or "Prohibited for JWE/JWS" could all work.
>
>
>
> FYI, the WebCrypto registrations are not in the Editor's Draft at
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html,
> though there remains the question of whether we could register an Array
> format instead of a string for JWK, as per my earlier mail (comments
> please!).
>
>
>
> ...Mark
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Minor question before I close this bug.
>
>
>
> Is there any sentiment to use a term that is not quite as “nasty” as
> “Prohibited” in the registration record.   Specifically something along the
> lines of “Key Transport Only”.
>
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing [email protected]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to