On 24 Dec 2013, at 12:13 pm, Manu Sporny <[email protected]> wrote:
> If the base64 issue was the only issue, I'd agree with you. However, the > review that was done outlined a number of other issues[1] that IMHO, > when combined with the goals of Persona, make JOSE a questionable fit. > JOSE was picked at the time because there really wasn't a viable > alternative. Now that there may be one, things might change. Off-topic for this mailing list, but I'd certainly be interested to see a discussion on dev-identity about this, particularly as the Persona team are (last I heard) busy aligning with the current JOSE data formats. > Persona doesn't seem to need any of the more complex functionality > brought by JOSE (resulting in unnecessarily complex and hard to debug > messages). Secure Messaging could achieve the same level of > functionality, more simply, for Web developers. In the document you refer to, it's unclear where the signature for EncryptedMessage2012 is placed -- is there a specification for this? -- Luke _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
