On 07 Jan 2014, at 11:37, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> wrote:
> If this makes the entire concept invalid that's a valid opinion, however it > is not a fact. It’s not the concept that is invalid. When people read “JSON”, they expect to be able to make use of the vast JSON ecosystem. That is not the case with the syntax that you are proposing. So it is more honest not to call it JSON. (Not beyond “leveraging JSON syntax for a new data interchange format”, that is.) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
