Thanks for these useful comments, Jim.  They helped make the section much more 
readable.  Please review the revised language in the -21 draft.

                                                                -- Mike

From: Jim Schaad [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 10:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Issue #121 - Section 7.2 JWS JSON Serialization

This is an improvement over the previous version, however there are a number of 
changes that can be done to make things better.


1.        Move the  requirement language into the list.  Thus "This member MUST 
be present." Should be part of the payload and signatures and signature list 
items and the separate paragraph can be removed

2.       Suggested text for signatures element:

<t hangText="signatures"/>The type of this element is an array of objects.  
Each object represents a separate signature or MAC computation over the 
payload.  This element MUST be present.
<vspace line="1"/>
The following members are defined for the JSON object for each signature:
<list style="hanging"/>

<t hangText="protected">contains the value BAES64URL(UTF8(JWS Protected 
Header)).  The value MUST be absent if there is no protected header.</t>

<t hangText="header">contains a JSON object.  The member of the object consist 
of the unprotected header name/value pairs.  This value MUST be absent if there 
are no unprotected header members.</t>

<t hangText="signature">contains the value BASE64URL(JWS Signature).  This 
value MUST be present.

</list>

</t>



3.       A note that one of protected and header will be present because the 
alg header parameter is required could be added, but I don't know that it is 
really necessary.

4.  If the paragraph starting with "The contents of the JWS Payload and JWS 
Signature values are" is required here, then it should also be in section 7.1

5.  I don't understand what the paragraph starting with "Each JWS Signature 
value is computed on the JWS Signing Input" is trying to say.  I think it could 
probably be said in a clearer and terser manner however.




_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to