Thanks, Vladimir.

Is there consensus in the WG that this is the right thing to do?  I'm
expecting some push-back on this one and want to make sure it has
consensus behind it.  I have heard of a couple of objections already.

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thanks, Vladimir.
>>
>> How would they be secured then?  With the current threat landscape, it
>> seems odd that we would be putting forth a method that is not secured?
>>  Does this rely on transport for security?
>
> Yes, securing the JWS message with TLS for instance, as Mike just
> pointed
> out in the his response.
>
> JWT-encoded ID tokens in OpenID Connect is one such example, but only
> when
> the token is returned from the OAuth 2.0 token endpoint where TLS is
> mandatory, clients can then register to receive plaintext ID tokens:
>
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#IDToken
>
>
> There is a section in the JWA spec to instruct developers of the various
> security
> considerations regarding use of "none" alg JWS:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-algorithms-25#section-8.5
>
>
> Vladimir
>
>
>
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Kathleen,
>> >
>> >
>> > > Section 3.6 - Can you explain why would this be included?  If you are
>> > not going to sign, I am not sure why one would use JOSE at all.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Perhaps the most popular application of JWS today is to construct JSON
>> > Web Tokens (JWT), such as the ID tokens in OpenID Connect. The JWT spec
>> > permits plain tokens that don't have a signature and this is enabled by
>> > the special case "none" alg in JWS.
>> >
>> > Plaintext JWTs are explained here:
>> >
>> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-19#section-6
>> >
>> >
>> > Vladimir
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Kathleen



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to