+1, this makes the most sense given that JWK is a highly extensible format
On 08/14/2014 05:27 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
+1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Kathleen Moriarty <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: 8/14/2014 2:26 PM
To: Stephen Farrell <mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: Richard Barnes <mailto:[email protected]>; Mike Scott
<mailto:[email protected]>; Trevor Perrin
<mailto:[email protected]>; Daniel Holth <mailto:[email protected]>; Mike
Jones <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [jose] JWK Elliptic Curve key representations and new curves
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 14, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Stephen Farrell
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 14/08/14 14:43, Richard Barnes wrote:
>> It would be very much preferable, however, to keep this on ice
until the
>> CFRG debate settles.
>
> Yep. That'd be sensible. Time enough when CFRG have
> produced a result.
Ok, JWA should move forward into last call once the shepherd report is
posted and this can be added into the registry and may require a
separate draft. Does that sound good?
Thanks,
Kathleen
>
> S.
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
