Tim,
The chance of the JOSE working group moving the vast world of deployed JSON infrastructure round to 0.00. Thus putting a MUST reject in here would essentially say you can't use well-debugged production software, and would be a really bad idea.
So, JSON is not easily changed, but adopting I-JSON will easier. OK, I'll take your word on that.
On the other hand, if JOSE specified that producers' messages MUST conform to I-JSON, and a couple other WGs climbed on that bandwagon, and the word started to get around, I wouldn't be surprised if a few of the popular JSON implementations added an I-JSON mode. That would be a good thing and lessen the attack surface of all JSON-based protocols (which these days, is a whole lot of them).

I am comfortable with mandating I-JSON if you believe that will be a more effective way to
encourage change.

Steve
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to